Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Monday, March 25, 2013

Where There is Light, Darkness Cannot Be

By:  Brandon James Scott Scholl 

The bible says in 1 John 1:5 that where there is light, darkness cannot be.  Within that paragraph where that verse, it explains that in the instance of light and darkness, it's talking about Christ and Satan.

   With that thought of Christ being light and Satan being darkness, this got me thinking about two things in particular.  The first, and the smaller of the two thoughts, is without light, darkness is abundant, which I'll explain in a moment.  The other thought is, if you're possessed or were possessed and then later in life went to church and went through being saved, does the fact you were possessed previously mean that you won't end up in Heaven?  That I'll go into more detail next to explain what I mean.

   Now, it isn't like darkness is a complete entity like light is.  Darkness is a primary thing unless there's a light in place, turning darkness away and light taking over that particular place.  In this case, that would have to do with Christ being within the heart of a man or woman who are saved and born again.  Now, with that, it makes me think back to the Fall in the Garden of Eden.  Adam and Eve eat the fruit off the tree of knowledge, and God casts them out of the Garden.  That's when God curses both Man and Woman and man's inherently sinful nature starts throughout the Human race.  With following this thought a little further, it would show that when the bible talks about Christ being the light and Satan and sin being the opposite of what Christ stands for, it would be confirmed that regardless of age or lifestyle, that darkness dwells in you unless you're saved as a Christian.

   This thought may make people uncomfortable if they open their mind up to the complete list of scenarios that this would be applied to.  Whether you're talking about a grandparent that was the best grandparent in all of history and led a life full of giving and charity, then dying.  If there was no light within that person's heart or soul as a result of accepting Christ, that would mean they wouldn't be going to heaven.  Or, the other end of the spectrum, and I know this is the type of thought that people get up in arms about and don't ever want to even think about, but the same would go for a baby that was born and died within it's infancy.  Babies are innocent and may not have even had a chance to choose between making a right or wrong decision.  However, that doesn't change the Word of God simply to make us feel better to sleep at night.

   Think about it.  As a child grows, you don't have to teach them how to steal, cheat, or be violent.  That's all part of human nature.  In fact, you have to teach them the opposite and stop that behavior from being primary.  That's an example of darkness being the state of the soul due to not having the light that is Christ within it.

I went and listened to a guest speaker one night at Northwest Nazarene University here in Idaho.  My girlfriend is now a senior there and she had to listen to the speaker for one of her classes at the time.  While the speaker was talking, he told the audience about what it's like coming from a native american background and becoming saved and fighting with the side of himself that was raised around sweat lodges, and praying to various gods and sacrifices of various sorts.  As he continued, he explained about how he wanted to be educated and no more about the Bible and then go and teach young Native Americans that were in a situation like his and were saved or even simply curious about his beliefs.  He went on about how, when reading the Bible, we shouldn't be reading it within a scope or parameters of what we THINK it should say or mean, but have the Bible and God's Word itself tell us in it's completeness how to live and believe.  RIGHT after he said that, he said that he believes that when an infant or child dies, they automatically go to heaven.  He didn't have a reason as to why this was a correct belief and said they were 100% sure that they would eventually find the scriptures to back up their belief on that.

This is the type of people out there nowadays that believe what they want and take only parts of the Bible that THEY decide, and simply ignore the parts they don't agree with or feel uncomfortable with and simply blame it on the Bible being translated so many times or that it was so long ago that it can't be confirmed that something was ever said or done contrary to their beliefs.

Honestly, there are things I read in the Bible that I wish I didn't even know existed or that I have come across while reading.  But, that doesn't change the fact the Bible says what it does and supports itself by saying that it's God breathed and His words don't come back void.  So, the next time you read something in the Bible that makes you uncomfortable or you don't want to be true, do your research on the matter and see what other scriptures say.  Don't put a set of parameters on the Bible when you read it, but let it put parameters on how you're to live your life and conduct yourself as a man or woman of God.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Personal Convictions

By: Brandon James Scott Scholl


I had a conversation the other day with a friend of mine about drinking alcohol. Now, as of this moment, he and I are both underage and haven't drank before. However, I won't mind having a drink when I"m older just not with the intent to ever get drunk. He, however, prefers to stay away from most forms of alcohol. Perhaps maybe a glass of wine every blue moon when he's married, but nothing really beyond that. His reason? Because he's crazy and weird enough that he doesn't need anything to alter him.

Now, I don't disagree with him on this at all. In fact, it's a different reason than what I'm used to. This friend of mine wasn't raised as to be afraid of alcohol either. As we continued talking about all of this though, it changed the subject to people and their personal convictions.

A personal conviction, in my own words, is something that perhaps God has or is working on you in your walk of life. An example of this would be something like the type of music that you might listen to. Some people may not have a problem listening to all genres of music while someone else may feel convicted that listening to rap music isn't in their best interest or it simply is just something they shouldn't be around.

In different situations I've dealt with, there are people who believe that a personal conviction that God may be working on within themselves should be preached and pushed on other people as a universal conviction. An example of this is when the person who feels convicted listening to any form of rap music tells all the people they are around that rap music is, let's say, the work of Satan. I have actually worked with people who have told me Rap music as well as loud Rock music has a negative force and undertone in it that is a spiritual attack and we, as Christians, shouldn't take part and listen to it. Perhaps I may consider myself to be a rebel, but I don't see things in this way or even agree with this claim.

See, one of the MANY problems I've seen Christianity start to run into is the belief that we should be the police for every other person that claims to be a Christian. Granted, we are supposed to be able to hold other Brothers and Sisters accountable. However, that doesn't mean that every aspect of our person Christian walk should be explained and applied to everyone. In my experiences, I have been told from numerous people things like "Rock and Rap music are the tools of the Devil", "Psychology and Sociology are wrong because it takes God out of the equation of life", or my personal favorite "Debating about Doctrine and Theology is unbiblical, wrong, and that's what the Enemy simply wants us to do. Instead, we should just simply love and embrace each other because that's what Jesus wants us to do."

To be fair, there are some beliefs that are universal. Things such as,
“You shall have no other gods before Me." ~Exodus 20:3
"You shall not murder." ~Exodus 20:13

It scares me how close minded some Christians can be to these things simply because they can't understand the difference between personal and universal Biblical convictions. It actually is quite sad that it has turned into this type of lifestyle. I mean, people used to do their research and not take people's word on things that they believed. Not because they didn't necessarily trust Pastor So and so, but because they made a point to read their Bible and learn how to apply these doctrines to their life.

So, when you're talking to a Brother or Sister in Christ, or maybe you're talking with friends who perhaps aren't Christians, think about what you're talking about with them. Is what you're talking about a personal or a universal Biblical conviction?

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Are Doctrine & Theological Quarrels/Debates Wrong?

~Brandon James Scott Scholl

I was at my church’s Men’s Breakfast this morning and it’s interesting how much you can get out of just one sentence that someone says and how random or completely off the subject what you can come up with is. We were talking about the tabernacle and how it was set up and why it’s set up the way it is.

There was one specific scripture that was mentioned about not quarreling and such. This made me wonder about things such as debating theology and doctrine. There are times that the bible explains, “23Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels.” -2 Timothy 2:23. However with that scripture what would be considered a stupid argument? There are people with the feeling that any kind of conversation, debate, or otherwise that has to do with doctrine or theology is considered a stupid argument. However, there is another scripture to think about, “16All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,” -2 Timothy 3:16. If the bible says it can be used for correcting, training, rebuking, and teaching then where would we draw the line between a pointless argument and something that may help them decide and weigh the ideas. From my own experience I spend time on chat rooms and various forums online where religion is the general topic that may be discussed. So, in that area I see no reason why and form of argument or discussion shouldn’t be allowed. If you don’t like what’s being discussed in that area then I believe you should either leave the room or put up with the discussion. Although, if you are at an event, like I have been, where there are fellow Christians and various religious topics have come up. I’ve been told by numerous people that we shouldn’t have conversations about that kind of stuff with other people because there’s a possibility of confrontation and such. My answer is this: Why not!?!? Why is it that so many Christians are so afraid of that? How would it be any different if you were talking to someone random or if someone wasn’t Christians? I would think it would be better to talk to another Christian than to run into someone who may attack your beliefs because stone walling someone by saying they should look it up for themselves is NOT TO BE THE ANSWER! We should be able and willing to walk them through if possible. 1 Peter 3:15 tells us to give a defense. Therefore, give a freaking defense and stop being a weenie. The bible says that iron sharpens iron. That means you learn and get stronger when talking with a fellow Christian. Think of it this way: How do you become a good warrior if you don’t practice?

A Saturday Night Atheist Debate

~Brandon James Scott Scholl

I went to a debate between Christian Apologist Matt Slick and L.A. Lawyer and Atheist Edward Tabash at BSU. The debate was extremely interesting and quite enjoyable as well. There were lots of things, however, that didn’t seem to make sense to me at all. When Mr. Tabash was talking he explained that a God couldn’t exist because he/she/it would have to have a brain with synapses and such. His defense for this position was science. Science was basically the entire defense for his side of the debate. Anyways, what I didn’t understand is science as we know it, in some areas, is basically from our observation of something. I don’t believe that you can say that a God can’t exist because it wouldn’t have a brain and therefore it can’t think and claim science backs you up because science, in this case, is a perspective of what we observe. I hope that makes sense. Another thing that I’ve noticed with various Atheists that I’ve talked to and from debates as well is they find a way to use emotion in their debate to sway the audience. For example, Mr. Tabash said that God cannot exist because if He was a good God then He wouldn’t allow suffering and why would a good God allow for his grandmother to have been abused in a Nazi concentration camp. This was something that was brought up quite a bit in his debate. The debate was not on historical issues at all. Granted, it’s sad that happened to his grandmother but why bring it up in the first place? We, as Christians, can say that the Nazi concentration camps and slaughter was a horrible event but we have a moral basis, the bible, to make that call. Atheists get their morals from licking their fingers and sticking them up in the air to see which way the winds are blowing that day. How can they claim that the Nazi camps or anything is bad without a moral basis? Secondly, just to clarify, the debate was on whether or not God exists. Also, in the middle of the argument Mr. Tabash machine gunned questions at Matt and Matt did answer as many of the questions as he could. Some were not relevent to the debate but he answered them anyways. In the closing arguments Mr. Tabash proceeded to point out every question that was shot at him earlier that wasn’t answered. His closing argument should have encompassed what he said in the debate. Therefore, I believe that the atheist lost the debate.

:D

~Brandon James Scott Scholl

People ask me all the time, “Brandon, why debate? Why are you so confrontational? Why do you do what you do?

To all of you people here is my response and I will allow direct quotes on this: “It’s so much fun!!! Try it sometime. If you don’t like that kind of stuff? Well, pray to God that He doesn’t put you in the position to be that way. As for me, He gave me this personality, these skills to further His Kingdom and progress in my walk with Him. Can’t argue with God. :D